Site description: 0 Not specified at this time

Website title: Sadly* the product of the Definitive Map Review is riddled with conspiracy to defraud according to the Fraud Act 2006. DEFRA's creation in 2001 appears a significant necessity to accommodate the machinery of public office fraud and political agenda, to undermine the heritage of England & Wales. Coincidental? – Twenty years after the 20 year rule of the Highways Act 1980 was written into the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981; DEFRA incited multiple appropriations and overt abuses of historic fact & common law evidence, that that overtly correlates to recorded facts which clearly predates the Norman Conquest – 1066, -it's been systematically manipulated since the 1990s. Sham public rights of way inquiries take place, often but not always, chaired by bias scoundrels like Peter Millman, Susan Doran or Helen Slade who write perjurous reports. [*exposing the rot!] | Devon County Council's public rights of ways department's bad faith in common purpose with the British Horse Society, in collaboration with others: DEFRA & the Planning Inspectorate at Bristol, have destroyed the accuracy of the Definitive Map by fraudulent means. DEFRA's creation in 2001 appears to be founded for procuring public rights of way where they don't currently exist. Politics required an administrator for the corruption: "Kick out any potential whistle-blowers, & claim the necessary twenty years identified in the Highways Act 1980, ─as written into the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981, when it passed.". Fantastically ornate fictional discoveries of evidence have been made; they in turn have been (continue to be) placed before wilfully corrupt inspectors like Peter Millman, Susan Doran or Helen Slade, who add their own gloss &/or slippery embellishment: bad faith, to make the Definitive Map more folly than our most fascinating heritage deserves. This corruption does not conform with Parliament's desire or intention. The criminality and public fraud is caught by the Fraud Act 2006. -Why does this overt corruption remain unpunished & impunity appear normal? Should local authorities be granted more power, if there is significant evidence of greater corruption at local government level?